RONULO Against. Anyone
FACTS: Rosa Catholic Parish Church regarding San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte. However, on the day of the matrimony, the supposed officiating priest, Fr. Mario Ragaza, would not solemnize the wedding abreast of training your partners were not successful to safe a wedding licenses. Once the a good recourse, Joey, who was after that sporting barong tagalong, and you will Claire, clothed for the a wedding clothes, with their mothers, sponsors and you will customers, proceeded to your Separate Church from Filipino Christians, also known as the newest Aglipayan Chapel. It questioned the petitioner, an Aglipayan priest, to perform a service to which the second conformed even with been informed by the pair they had zero marriage certification.
This new petitioner wishing his choir and planned a bulk towards the couples for a passing fancy day. The guy held the ceremony regarding presence of your own bridegroom, the new fiance, its mothers, the main and you will secondary sponsors as well as the remainder of the enjoy subscribers.
The brand new prosecution’s witnesses, Joseph and Mary Anne Yere, testified into the incidents of the ceremony. Joseph is actually the new veil recruit whenever you are Mary Anne try the new wire recruit regarding matrimony. Mary Anne testified that she watched the latest bride walk-down the fresh new section. She and additionally saw the happy couple change its marriage rings, kiss both, and you will sign a document. She heard the fresh new petitioner instructing the principal sponsors so you’re able to signal the relationship contract. After that, they went along to new reception, got supper and took photos. She spotted the new petitioner truth be told there.
Fl Umadac, the mother away from Joey, affirmed one to she read the happy couple state for the service one they grab both because the husband and wife. Months following the wedding, she visited the latest civil regional municipal registrar out-of San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte which have Atty. Mariano R. Nalupta Jr. where she gotten a certification you to no relationship permit was approved with the pair.
The petitioner, whenever you are admitting that he held a ceremony, denied that their act out of blessing the happy couple are tantamount so you can an excellent solemnization of marriage since contemplated by-law.
ISSUE: Claimed the newest petitioner was guilty of violating Blog post 352 of your own Modified Penal Password (RPC) to have allegedly carrying out an illegal marriage ceremony.
She and identified the wedding invitation supplied to her by Joey
RATIO: Petitioner held an illegal wedding ceremony. The offense as the sent to when you look at the Ways 352 of one’s RPC refers to the abilities regarding ily Password and therefore checks out:
(3) A wedding service that takes put towards appearance of brand new hiring parties before solemnizing administrator as well as their individual declaration one they take each other as wife and husband throughout the presence out-of for around a couple of witnesses of courtroom ages.
Ways. six. Zero given setting otherwise religious rite into solemnization of your own relationship is required. It might be requisite, however, for the contracting parties to seem myself before the solemnizing officer and you may state throughout the presence out of not less than one or two witnesses away from legal age that they bring each other because partner and you will spouse. This statement should be part of the wedding certification and this will feel closed of the hiring events and their witnesses and you can attested by the solemnizing officer.
The new Finest Court informed me one what generated the fresh new petitioner’s operate a great wedding party and not just only blessing try one to whenever you are there isn’t any given form otherwise religious rite, all that is actually requisite is actually Divorced dating app “into contracting people to look physically before the solemnizing administrator and you will declare throughout the visibility away from not less than two witnesses out of courtroom ages that they just take one another while the husband and you will partner.”
From what basic requirements, the fresh petitioner admitted your activities featured in advance of him and this facts is testified to help you by the witnesses. To the second requirements, we discover you to definitely, contrary to the petitioner’s allegation, the brand new prosecution seems, through the testimony of witnesses, that employing events privately declared which they grab one another given that wife and husband. Therefore, it is clear one to petitioner conducted a marriage ceremony rather than just blessing.
